Protect workplace communications across Slack, Microsoft Teams, corporate email, and every internal channel. Prevent harassment, detect confidential leaks, enforce HR policies, and safeguard employee wellbeing with enterprise-grade AI moderation built for the modern distributed workforce.
From Slack channels to corporate email, our AI moderation engine secures every communication layer in your organization with real-time policy enforcement and threat detection.
Detect bullying, sexual harassment, microaggressions, and hostile behavior across all internal communication channels. Our AI understands workplace context, power dynamics, and organizational hierarchy to catch subtle violations that keyword filters miss entirely.
Automatically identify and prevent the unauthorized sharing of trade secrets, financial data, customer PII, source code, and proprietary documents before they leave your organization through any communication channel.
Ensure continuous compliance with employment laws, anti-discrimination regulations, EEOC guidelines, and internal company policies through automated monitoring that generates audit-ready compliance reports and real-time alerts.
Identify linguistic patterns and behavioral signals that indicate potential insider threats, including disgruntlement escalation, data exfiltration planning, and collusion with external parties through sophisticated behavioral analysis.
Monitor communication patterns for signs of burnout, distress, isolation, and mental health concerns. Provide early warning systems to HR teams enabling proactive support while maintaining strict employee privacy standards.
Track communication patterns for exclusionary language, unconscious bias indicators, and DEI policy violations. Generate analytics that help organizations build more inclusive workplace cultures across all departments and teams.
Our enterprise moderation engine integrates with every communication platform in your technology stack, creating a unified safety layer that monitors Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Workspace, Zoom chat, corporate email, and custom internal tools in real time. Every message, file share, and reaction is analyzed against your organization's unique policy framework.
Modern enterprises operate across dozens of communication channels simultaneously. Our AI moderation platform provides consistent policy enforcement across every channel, detecting harassment, data leaks, and compliance violations whether they occur in a public Slack channel, a private Teams DM, or a Zoom meeting sidebar chat.
Our infrastructure processes billions of workplace messages monthly, delivering real-time protection for organizations of every size across every industry.
The modern enterprise communication ecosystem is remarkably complex, encompassing an ever-expanding array of platforms, channels, and interaction modes that employees use to conduct business every day. From instant messaging applications like Slack and Microsoft Teams to traditional corporate email systems, from video conferencing sidebars to collaborative document editing, the volume and diversity of workplace communications have grown exponentially. The shift toward remote and hybrid work models has only accelerated this trend, with organizations now managing communications that span multiple time zones, cultural contexts, and regulatory jurisdictions simultaneously. This explosion in communication volume and channel diversity creates unprecedented challenges for organizations seeking to maintain professional standards, protect sensitive information, and comply with a growing body of employment and data protection regulations.
The stakes of inadequate enterprise communication moderation are extraordinarily high. A single instance of undetected workplace harassment can result in multi-million-dollar lawsuits, devastating reputational damage, and the loss of top talent. Confidential information leaked through a casual Slack message can compromise competitive advantage, violate regulatory requirements, and expose the organization to legal liability. Insider threats that incubate in private channels can escalate into significant security incidents before traditional detection systems recognize the pattern. Meanwhile, employees experiencing burnout, mental health crises, or hostile work environments may exhibit warning signs in their digital communications long before those issues manifest in performance metrics or formal complaints. The challenge for modern enterprises is to monitor and protect these communications effectively while respecting employee privacy, maintaining organizational culture, and supporting the open collaboration that drives productivity and innovation.
Enterprise workplace moderation differs fundamentally from consumer-facing content moderation in several critical respects. The relationship between the organization and its employees creates specific legal obligations around privacy, employment law, and duty of care that do not exist in consumer social media contexts. The professional context of workplace communications means that the same language may carry different significance depending on hierarchical relationships, departmental norms, and business context. A directive from a manager to a direct report requires different analysis than a peer-to-peer exchange, and industry-specific terminology that might appear alarming in a general context may be entirely routine in a specialized workplace. Effective enterprise moderation must understand these nuances while still detecting genuine policy violations, safety threats, and compliance risks with high accuracy and minimal false positives that could erode employee trust and organizational culture.
Slack and Microsoft Teams have become the central nervous systems of modern enterprises, hosting millions of messages daily across public channels, private groups, direct messages, and threaded conversations. These platforms serve as the primary venue for casual collaboration, project coordination, social bonding, and increasingly, critical business decision-making. The informal, real-time nature of chat communication encourages rapid, unfiltered exchanges that can quickly cross professional boundaries in ways that more deliberate communication modes like email rarely do. Our moderation API integrates natively with both Slack and Microsoft Teams through their enterprise administration APIs, analyzing messages in real time as they are sent while maintaining the speed and responsiveness that users expect from instant messaging platforms.
The technical architecture of our Slack and Teams integration is designed for zero-perceptible-latency operation, meaning that messages are analyzed and policy decisions are rendered before the message is fully delivered to recipients. For messages that violate severe policy thresholds, such as explicit harassment, sharing of credentials, or confidential document attachments, the system can automatically quarantine the message, notify the sender of the policy violation, and alert designated compliance personnel. For less severe violations, the system can add contextual warnings, flag messages for review, or log the incident for pattern analysis without disrupting the communication flow. This graduated response framework ensures that the moderation system enhances rather than impedes workplace productivity, intervening decisively when necessary while allowing normal business communication to proceed without friction.
Beyond individual message analysis, our platform performs longitudinal behavioral analysis across messaging platforms, tracking communication patterns over time to identify concerning trends that no single message would reveal. An employee who gradually increases the frequency and intensity of negative language directed at a colleague may be exhibiting the early stages of workplace bullying that, message by message, remains below the threshold of individual policy violations. Similarly, an insider threat actor may carefully distribute sensitive information across multiple small, seemingly innocuous messages that only reveal their aggregate significance through pattern analysis. Our AI models maintain behavioral baselines for communication patterns across the organization, detecting deviations that indicate emerging risks and providing HR and security teams with the early warning intelligence needed to intervene before situations escalate into crises.
Enterprise messaging platforms contain channels and groups with widely varying purposes, audiences, and appropriate communication norms. An engineering team's technical channel may routinely discuss security vulnerabilities and exploit code that would be alarming in a general business context. A sales team's competitive intelligence channel may reference competitor information that requires careful handling. A social channel for employee culture may tolerate humor and casual language that would be inappropriate in a client-facing communications context. Our moderation engine supports granular, channel-specific policy configurations that adapt enforcement thresholds and violation categories to the purpose and audience of each communication space, ensuring that policy enforcement is contextually appropriate rather than rigidly uniform.
The channel-specific policy framework extends to handling cross-channel information flow, monitoring when content appropriate for one context is shared or forwarded into an inappropriate context. For example, confidential financial data discussed in a restricted executive channel may be inadvertently or deliberately shared into a broader team channel, or sensitive HR information from a private management discussion may be screen-captured and posted in a public forum. Our system tracks content provenance and context transitions, alerting when information moves from restricted to unrestricted environments and providing audit trails that document exactly how sensitive information propagated through the organization's communication ecosystem. This cross-channel awareness is essential for organizations managing complex information classification schemes and regulatory requirements around data compartmentalization.
Workplace harassment in digital communications rarely manifests as a single, unambiguous incident. More commonly, it develops as a pattern of behavior that escalates over time, beginning with microaggressions, exclusionary language, and subtle power dynamics before progressing to overt hostility, intimidation, or explicit harassment. Our AI models are trained on extensive datasets of workplace communication patterns annotated by employment law specialists and organizational psychologists, enabling detection of harassment at every stage of this escalation continuum. The system identifies not only the overtly hostile messages that any keyword filter could catch but also the subtle patterns of diminishment, exclusion, and intimidation that create hostile work environments and drive talented employees out of organizations.
The detection of power-dynamic-aware harassment represents a particularly sophisticated capability of our enterprise moderation system. The same language carries different weight and different legal significance depending on the hierarchical relationship between the communicating parties. A casual suggestion between peers takes on a coercive dimension when directed from a supervisor to a subordinate. Repeated unsolicited after-hours messages from a manager to a direct report may indicate boundary violations that would be unremarkable between peers. Our system integrates with organizational directory services to understand reporting relationships, team structures, and authority dynamics, applying differentiated analysis that accounts for the power imbalances that distinguish workplace harassment from ordinary interpersonal friction. This hierarchical awareness is critical for detecting the most damaging and legally consequential forms of workplace harassment, which frequently exploit positional power to maintain plausible deniability while creating genuinely hostile conditions for subordinates.
Beyond individual harassment, our system detects broader patterns of toxic workplace behavior that degrade organizational culture and employee wellbeing. This includes passive-aggressive communication patterns, persistent negativity that demoralizes team members, exclusionary group dynamics that marginalize specific individuals, and communication styles that create psychological safety concerns within teams. The AI analyzes sentiment trends, communication network patterns, and linguistic markers associated with toxic workplace dynamics, providing organizational leaders with visibility into cultural health metrics that would otherwise remain invisible until they manifest as turnover, performance decline, or formal complaints.
The system also monitors for retaliation patterns following formal complaints, HR investigations, or whistleblower reports. Retaliation against employees who raise concerns is both legally prohibited and remarkably common in many organizations. Our AI tracks changes in communication patterns directed toward employees who have filed complaints, identifying increases in exclusionary behavior, negative tone shifts, work assignment changes communicated through messaging platforms, and other digital indicators of retaliatory conduct. This monitoring provides a critical safety net for employees who report concerns and gives organizations the documentation needed to demonstrate their commitment to anti-retaliation policies in the event of legal challenge.
Enterprise communications routinely contain information at varying levels of sensitivity, from publicly shareable marketing materials to highly restricted financial data, personnel records, and trade secrets. Our content classification engine automatically identifies the sensitivity level of information contained in messages, attachments, code snippets, and shared documents, applying appropriate policy controls based on the classification. The system recognizes structured data patterns such as Social Security numbers, credit card numbers, and account credentials, as well as unstructured sensitive content such as strategic planning discussions, merger and acquisition deliberations, and proprietary technical specifications. Unlike rule-based DLP systems that rely on rigid pattern matching, our AI understands the contextual significance of information, distinguishing between a test credit card number in a developer channel and an actual customer payment credential shared in a support conversation.
The intellectual property protection capabilities extend to detecting the sharing of proprietary source code, algorithm descriptions, research findings, and product roadmap information through enterprise communication channels. In an era where employees routinely collaborate across organizational boundaries with contractors, partners, and vendor teams, the risk of inadvertent intellectual property exposure is substantial. Our system monitors communications for content that matches or closely resembles registered intellectual property, flagging potential exposure events and providing security teams with the context needed to assess whether the sharing was authorized and appropriate. This capability is particularly valuable for technology companies, pharmaceutical firms, and other organizations where intellectual property represents a significant portion of enterprise value and competitive advantage.
Despite the rise of instant messaging platforms, corporate email remains a primary channel for formal business communications, external correspondence, and document distribution. Email presents unique moderation challenges because it bridges internal and external communication boundaries, carrying organizational information to recipients outside the enterprise perimeter where it cannot be recalled or controlled. Our email screening system integrates with Exchange, Office 365, and Google Workspace email environments, analyzing both outbound and internal email content, attachments, and metadata for policy violations, sensitive information exposure, and behavioral anomalies that may indicate insider threats or compromised accounts.
The email screening engine performs deep content analysis of attachments, including document text extraction, image analysis, and metadata examination that can identify sensitive information embedded in spreadsheets, presentations, PDFs, and image files. The system detects attempts to circumvent DLP controls through techniques such as password-protecting sensitive attachments, encoding confidential data within image files, or splitting sensitive documents across multiple emails to avoid triggering content-based detection. By analyzing communication patterns holistically rather than examining individual emails in isolation, our system identifies sophisticated exfiltration attempts that would evade traditional email security gateways focused on malware detection and spam filtering.
Enterprise communications are subject to an extensive and complex web of employment regulations that vary by jurisdiction, industry, and organizational size. In the United States alone, organizations must comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, state-specific employment laws, and numerous other regulations that govern workplace conduct and communication. Our compliance monitoring engine maintains current awareness of applicable regulations across all jurisdictions where an organization operates, automatically flagging communications that may constitute violations and generating audit-ready documentation that demonstrates organizational compliance efforts.
The compliance monitoring extends to industry-specific regulatory requirements that impose additional obligations on enterprise communications. Financial services firms must comply with SEC and FINRA regulations requiring the retention and monitoring of employee communications. Healthcare organizations must ensure that internal communications maintain HIPAA compliance when discussing patient information. Government contractors must adhere to ITAR and EAR regulations restricting the discussion of controlled technical data. Our platform provides industry-specific compliance modules that layer specialized monitoring capabilities on top of the general employment law compliance framework, ensuring that organizations in regulated industries maintain full compliance with their sector-specific obligations through automated, continuous monitoring rather than periodic manual audits.
Beyond legal compliance, enterprises maintain internal policies governing acceptable use of communication platforms, information handling procedures, code of conduct standards, and professional behavior expectations. Our policy enforcement engine allows organizations to define custom policy rules that reflect their unique cultural values, operational requirements, and risk tolerances. These custom policies can address organization-specific concerns such as restrictions on discussing pending litigation, guidelines for communicating with regulatory bodies, protocols for handling customer complaints, and standards for internal debate and disagreement. The system converts natural-language policy descriptions into enforceable monitoring rules, making policy implementation accessible to HR and compliance teams without requiring technical expertise in regular expressions or classification model configuration.
The policy enforcement framework supports escalation workflows that route potential violations to appropriate reviewers based on the severity and category of the detected issue. Low-severity policy reminders can be delivered directly to the employee as educational nudges, medium-severity violations can be escalated to direct managers or HR business partners, and high-severity incidents can be immediately routed to legal, security, or senior leadership as the situation requires. Each escalation level carries configurable response options, from informal coaching conversations to formal documentation and investigation initiation. This graduated response framework ensures that policy enforcement is proportionate, consistent, and documented, protecting both the organization from liability and employees from disproportionate responses to minor infractions.
Effective enterprise moderation must include robust protections for employees who report misconduct through internal channels. Whistleblower protection is both a legal requirement under numerous federal and state statutes and a critical component of organizational integrity. Our platform provides dedicated monitoring for anonymous reporting channels, ensuring that these channels remain secure, that reports are routed to appropriate parties without exposing the reporter's identity, and that subsequent communications are monitored for any indication of retaliation against individuals suspected of filing reports. The system maintains cryptographic separation between reporting channel data and general communication monitoring data, ensuring that even administrators with broad system access cannot correlate anonymous reports with individual employees.
The whistleblower protection framework extends to monitoring organizational communications for patterns that might indicate attempts to identify anonymous reporters, suppress complaints, or coordinate retaliatory actions. When the system detects management communications that reference or appear to investigate the source of an anonymous report, it generates immediate alerts to the organization's compliance officer or designated ethics authority. This proactive monitoring provides a crucial safeguard for reporting integrity, deterring retaliation by making it clear that attempts to identify or punish whistleblowers will be detected and documented. Organizations benefit from enhanced reporting culture, as employees are more willing to raise concerns when they trust that the anonymous reporting infrastructure is genuinely protected.
Insider threats represent one of the most challenging security risks facing modern enterprises, and digital communications often contain the earliest and most reliable indicators of insider threat activity. Our content analysis engine applies behavioral analytics to enterprise communications, identifying linguistic and behavioral patterns associated with insider threat progression. Research in organizational psychology and security science has identified consistent patterns in the communications of individuals who ultimately commit insider threat acts, including increased expression of grievances, withdrawal from team communication, increased interest in access permissions and security protocols, and communication with external contacts outside normal business patterns. Our AI models are trained on these established behavioral indicators, providing security teams with early warning intelligence that enables intervention before insider threats materialize into security incidents.
The insider threat detection capability includes sophisticated analysis of data movement patterns within enterprise communications. The system tracks when employees begin sharing unusual volumes of information through messaging platforms, when file sharing patterns deviate from established baselines, and when communications suggest coordination with external parties for information transfer. Crucially, the system distinguishes between the normal information sharing that is essential to business operations and the anomalous patterns that indicate potential data theft, espionage, or sabotage. By correlating communication content analysis with behavioral pattern analytics, the system achieves high detection accuracy while maintaining the low false positive rates that are essential for maintaining employee trust and avoiding the organizational damage caused by false insider threat accusations.
The permanent shift toward remote and hybrid work models has fundamentally transformed enterprise communication patterns, creating new moderation challenges that did not exist in traditional office environments. Remote workers communicate almost exclusively through digital channels, meaning that the subtle social cues, body language signals, and environmental context that moderate in-person interactions are absent from the vast majority of workplace exchanges. This absence increases the likelihood of misunderstandings, escalation of conflicts, and the erosion of professional boundaries that physical office separation naturally maintains. Our moderation platform addresses these remote-specific challenges through enhanced contextual analysis that compensates for the reduced social signaling in purely digital communication environments.
Remote work also introduces challenges related to the blurring of professional and personal boundaries. Employees working from home may use enterprise communication platforms during extended hours, share personal information more freely in informal channels, and experience isolation and disconnection that manifests in communication patterns. Our system monitors for indicators of unhealthy work-life boundary erosion, including excessive after-hours communication, patterns suggesting burnout or overwork, and signs of social isolation that may indicate an employee needs additional support. These wellbeing indicators are surfaced to HR teams in anonymized, aggregated forms that enable organizational intervention without compromising individual privacy, supporting the duty of care that employers owe to their remote workforce.
Enterprise collaboration platforms like SharePoint, OneDrive, Google Drive, and Confluence are essential productivity tools that also represent significant vectors for information leakage and policy violations. Our document sharing safety capabilities extend content moderation beyond messaging to encompass the full lifecycle of collaborative documents, from creation through editing to sharing and distribution. The system analyzes document content, access permissions, sharing patterns, and version history to identify potential policy violations, sensitive information exposure, and unauthorized access patterns. When an employee shares a document containing confidential financial projections with an external email address, when a draft legal filing is inadvertently placed in a public folder, or when a departing employee downloads an unusual volume of proprietary documents, the system detects these events and initiates appropriate response workflows.
The collaboration security framework includes real-time monitoring of video meeting chat streams, which have become an increasingly common vector for both harassment and information sharing that falls outside traditional communication monitoring. During video conferences on Zoom, Teams, Webex, and Google Meet, chat messages may contain sensitive information, inappropriate comments, or links to unauthorized resources that require the same level of moderation as persistent messaging channels. Our system captures and analyzes meeting chat content in real time, applying the same policy framework used for persistent messaging while accounting for the ephemeral, synchronous nature of meeting chat that may require different response protocols than asynchronous messaging channels.
Our enterprise moderation platform is built on a zero-trust security architecture that ensures all moderation operations meet the most stringent enterprise security requirements. All data in transit is encrypted with TLS 1.3, all data at rest is encrypted with AES-256, and all API communications are authenticated with mutual TLS and signed JWT tokens. The platform supports deployment in customer-managed cloud environments, on-premises installations, and air-gapped networks for organizations with the most restrictive security requirements. Role-based access controls ensure that moderation data is accessible only to authorized personnel, with full audit logging of all access events and administrative actions. For organizations subject to data residency requirements, the platform supports geographic data isolation ensuring that employee communication data never leaves the designated jurisdiction.
The moderation API integrates with enterprise communication platforms through multiple integration patterns optimized for different deployment scenarios. Native integrations with Slack Enterprise Grid, Microsoft Teams for Enterprise, Google Workspace, and Zoom leverage platform-specific administration APIs to provide seamless, real-time moderation without requiring changes to end-user workflows. For custom enterprise communication platforms, our REST API and webhook-based integration patterns enable rapid integration with any messaging system that supports standard web protocols. The API processes messages in under 50 milliseconds average latency, ensuring that moderation decisions are rendered before messages are delivered to recipients for time-sensitive enforcement scenarios. Batch processing endpoints support historical analysis of archived communications for compliance audits, investigations, and retroactive policy application.
SIEM integration capabilities enable the moderation platform to feed threat intelligence and compliance events directly into enterprise security operations centers, correlating communication-based alerts with other security telemetry to provide comprehensive threat visibility. Integration with HR information systems allows the moderation engine to maintain current organizational hierarchies, employment statuses, and team structures that inform contextual policy enforcement. Compliance platform integrations with tools like OneTrust, SAI360, and LogicGate enable automated regulatory compliance tracking and reporting. This ecosystem integration approach ensures that enterprise communication moderation operates as a seamlessly connected component of the broader enterprise security and compliance infrastructure rather than an isolated, siloed capability.
Everything you need to know about implementing AI content moderation for your enterprise workplace communications.
Join thousands of organizations using our AI-powered moderation to protect workplace communications, ensure compliance, and build healthier workplace cultures.